Better technology needs stronger public accountability.
An automated system can affect a person's application, access to a service, or ability to challenge a decision. People deserve to know what a system does and where human responsibility sits.
What I will work to change.
I will push for a public inventory of city AI systems, an explanation of the purpose each serves, and clear human review for consequential decisions. Data retention, vendor access, and security should be considered before a system grows, with a practical route to question an automated result.
- Publish an inventory of city AI systems and the purposes they serve.
- Require human review and a way to challenge consequential automated decisions.
- Review data retention, vendor access, and security before expanding a system.
Where the work starts.
Inventory systems and the decisions they support. Identify the data involved and who can access it. Publish the purpose, owner, and review process in plain language, then evaluate whether the system improves the service it was bought to support.
Measure it in public.
Systems disclosed · Human review · Data access controls
The point of measurement is to make the next decision better. Publish the starting point, report the change, and let residents see whether their experience improves. If a process is still failing people, explain what will change next.
Your experience belongs in the plan.
Tell me about the problem you have encountered, where it happened, and what a useful response would look like. A clear description of daily life can reveal what a citywide dashboard misses.
Share your priority